China
Dialogue fails to objectively review the scientific debate about global warming in the environmental best seller, The Deniers, by Lawrence Solomon of Energy Probe, Canada's top energy industry watchdog. Probe International calls the author's response a "must read" for Chinese environmentalists, lawmakers, and scholars.
Response to China Dialogue review read more » [2]
Wikipedia, the community-edited encyclopedia that anyone can revise, is one of the Web's biggest success stories. What you may not know is that it also has become an important player in the political world.
Started in 2001 on a shoestring budget, Wikipedia now ranks as the ninth most popular Web site in the U.S., according to Internet ratings company Alexa.com, outpacing such "old media" stalwarts as CNN, ESPN and the New York Times. (It's even more popular worldwide, where it is currently the seventh most-read site.) read more » [7]
Lawrence Solomon: Airing the dubious science of global warming
read more » [12]
On a tour earlier this week for his new book on global warming, The Deniers, Lawrence Solomon made a presentation at the Petroleum Club in Calgary. His remarks, adapted, appear below.
read more » [17]
We've done a disservice. I'm talking about the media, in the aggregate, about global warming.
We skim over uncertainty inherent in predictions. The perils we face, not from potential catastrophes, but from over reach, we discount. If we did the same for hurricanes, tourism would be harmed every time a storm formed off Africa.
We would be placed in a "cone of uncertainty" for weeks at a time, scaring off potential visitors. read more » [23]
With less heat and less carbon dioxide, the planet could become less hospitable and less green.
Planet Earth is on a roll! read more » [28]
How does the third world insure itself against Lieberman-Warner?
Senators Joseph Lieberman (I., Conn.) and John Warner (R., Va.) base their proposed Climate Security Act legislation on two fundamental premises: That there is a scientific consensus on global warming and that, even if the scientists are wrong and the global-warming risk never materializes, we will at least have aided the environment.
read more » [34]
"Scepticism and the questioning of orthodoxies must be an integral part of the scientific process."
A new book shows that some of those labelled ‘the deniers’ of global warming, and depicted as oil-funded crooks, are in fact sensible, respectable scientists. Why have they been made into heretics?
read more » [39]
Lawrence Solomon works for Energy Probe, a Canadian environmentalist group dedicated to opposing the nuclear-power industry. Mr. Solomon also writes a weekly column for Toronto's National Post and is aligned to the Urban Renaissance Institute. One, therefore, might consider him a tried-and-true believer in the concept of man-made global warming. And yes, he was. read more » [44]
The Deniers received special mention on the "Political Grapevine" segment of "Special Report with Brit Hume":
"A man described as an anti-nuclear, 1970s peace activist who opposes subsidies to the oil industry has written a book challenging conventional wisdom about global warming. Lawrence Solomon lays out arguments on both sides -- including information that often goes unreported in the mainstream media.
read more » [49]
Links:
[1] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/china-dialogue-review-global-warming-debate-not-objective-says-author-env
[2] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/china-dialogue-review-global-warming-debate-not-objective-says-author-env
[3] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[4] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[5] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[6] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat
[7] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat
[8] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[9] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[10] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[11] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/hysteria-persecution-and-fraud
[12] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/hysteria-persecution-and-fraud
[13] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[14] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[15] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[16] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/costs-benefits-and-risks/what-i-told-the-petroleum-club
[17] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/costs-benefits-and-risks/what-i-told-the-petroleum-club
[18] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/costs-benefits-and-risks
[19] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[20] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[21] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[22] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/skeptics-climate-are-worth-listen
[23] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/skeptics-climate-are-worth-listen
[24] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[25] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[26] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[27] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/costs-benefits-and-risks/praise-carbon-dioxide
[28] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/costs-benefits-and-risks/praise-carbon-dioxide
[29] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/costs-benefits-and-risks
[30] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[31] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[32] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[33] http://energy.probeinternational.org/selective-precaution
[34] http://energy.probeinternational.org/selective-precaution
[35] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[36] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[37] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[38] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/thou-shalt-not-ask-awkward-questions-review-the-deniers
[39] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/thou-shalt-not-ask-awkward-questions-review-the-deniers
[40] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[41] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[42] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[43] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/the-deniers-global-warming-advocate-rethinks-position
[44] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/the-deniers-global-warming-advocate-rethinks-position
[45] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[46] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[47] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[48] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/unconventional-wisdom
[49] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/unconventional-wisdom
[50] http://energy.probeinternational.org/taxonomy/term/18
[51] http://energy.probeinternational.org/the-deniers
[52] http://energy.probeinternational.org/print
[53] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D1
[54] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D2
[55] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D3
[56] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D4
[57] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D5
[58] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D6
[59] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D7
[60] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D1
[61] http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers%3Fpage%3D7